Puppeteer is not a browser automation tool like selenium, protractor, webdriverIO. My team added 3x retries to out tests to get that rate down to 0.5%. Why are we still considering puppeteer? Automation speeds have never been a major concern of mines. Since Selenium, Taiko and Puppeteer can integrate with any test framework they can take advantage of the framework’s debugging, IDE, CI/CD support and more. Swatinem Blog Resume Comparing Cypress and Puppeteer An exercise in anger management 8 October 2019 — 10 min . It hasn't even been 8 months since playwright was finally passing all its automated tests. Selenium. It’s only a “tiny concern” because the results seem so similar. Member. Clearly the fastest way to go if you can separate out the tests like that. Now for the difference. PROS • Works with most browsers • Multi-language support • Huge community of users. It was developed by Google. So we will need to see - does Playwright take over now, or does Puppeteer regain steam with a new team and the two start diverging? Flakiness is a thing, but this is what I learned: - In the end, it comes down to how you script it. CONS • Difficult to run on all browsers • A bit slower than Puppeteer. Puppeteer’s GitHub documentation Q&A. There are projects like jpuppeteer and puppeteer-sharp but they are third-party and much much smaller than the official Selenium alternatives. CONS • Difficult to run on all browsers • A bit slower than Puppeteer. Although it is still in the early stages, it promises a bright future, backed up as it is by the illustrious Chrome dev tools team. Compare npm package download statistics over time: cypress vs testcafe vs nightwatch vs puppeteer vs selenium webdriver And there was no available package for jest to help with it at the time so I rolled out a custom retry solution, wasting a ton of time, but it at least it solved our problem that should not have existed. Selenium test was slower mainly because of the 5 second sleep in each test. Presenting tinyhttp 1.0 - a 0-legacy, tiny & fast web framework as a replacement of Express, written in TypeScript. Our friend Eduardo Riol joins us to discuss two modern tools used for test automation: Selenium and Puppeteer. Puppeteer is designed only for chrome and run only in Node.js environment. Needed a retry pattern for Selenium at my past job as well. In a previous role we had a rigorous set of UI tests written with Selenium for every single user requirement, any instability came from not effectively waiting for asynchronous code to run in the UI. Selenium sounds cool in theory: write one set of tests that run on all browsers and devices, woohoo! If you are interested in running chrome headless from selenium this thread can be valuable for you. Use the correct wait statements, understand how your app loads, what parts are async, what parts are hidden on load. But if one was drastically slower, then it is important. A user story is a single sentence that states the feature’s persona/role, action, and reason. Benchmark: Puppeteer vs. Selenium vs. Playwright vs. WebDriverIO. Difference between Puppeteer and Selenium : S.No. But development on Puppeteer so far doesn't seem to have stopped. Definitely using this as a example of a good test. Today at 11:59 AM ... Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email … I have never used Puppeteer before. Nov 17 2020 How we improved the Lighthouse score of our landing page to 96. 3. "Dynamic and idempotent server configuration" is the … 3. But still interesting. 6. I’d like to see the test failure rates of these platforms too. Selenium supports more browsers than does Puppeteer. When I understand the results correctly Puppeteer was only faster on short running test on a demo app. Headed Puppeteer : If you have executed above example, then you might not have seen anything because by default the puppeteer executes the tests in headless chromium. We are looking to replace our Selenium approach to automated web data collection and have been recommended Puppeteer or Chromeless. Among all Selenium alternatives the most interesting emerging ones are tools developed around Google Chrome DevTools Protocol (opens new window).And the most prominent one is Puppeteer (opens new window).It operates over Google Chrome directly without requiring additional tools like ChromeDriver. Has great and well designed API with nice tools (such as playwright-cli). try convincing Apple, MS, and Google to work together), and even implemented this API in more than 10 languages (including JS). All about the JavaScript programming language! Given the speed differences shown in this article, Puppeteer is clearly not being succeeded in all areas. Moreover, someone may choose Puppeteer over Selenium for functional differences (for example, Selenium is easier to catch and block) diroussel 17 days ago. You can’t mix Playwright and Selenium together at … Thread starter Foxy; Start date Today at 11:59 AM; Status Not open for further replies. First, the TypeScript version automatically handles exceptions. Puppeteer Selenium; 1. Cookies help us deliver our Services. Generally speaking, the development team collects user stories that map to a feature. Twitter Facebook Reddit Hackernews. Compare these two snippets of code: Scala + Selenium TypeScript + Puppeteer Right away the TypeScript version is simpler and comes with some additional advantages. A powerful feature of both Selenium and Puppeteer is the ability to run JavaScript in the browser. It seems tha… Nov 17 2020 How we improved the Lighthouse score of our landing page to 96. Oct 28 2020 Scaling Puppeteer & Playwright on … Isn’t that the only one that can multi-thread tests? Cross browser support. I've seen folks make scripts that generated 100's of test cases by using variables etc. Don't do that. But that effectively puts a cap of 200 tests on us (run 200 tests with a 0.5% false positive failure rate means it’s likely one test will fail every run). AI. Selenium. - Keep scripts short. Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. If you want to use JavaScript then you can either mix Selenium and Puppeteer or use Playwright. It’s just a simple JSON RPC over websockets. You could argue for that, given also that a lot of the team previously on Puppeteer is now working on Playwright. Selenium is a framework which is designed to automate test for web applications. The uses of this feature are nearly endless, and using this feature in Puppeteer is nearly effortless. One of the things I like is the ability to go headless with chrome running on AWS lambda. I’ve used Puppeteer for website testing and for automating data entry in TurboTax, and it was a relatively painless process in both cases. Descripción de Episode 1: Selenium vs Puppeteer discussion. Introduction: This is the #11 post of my Scrapy Tutorial Series, in this Scrapy tutorial, I will talk about the features of Scrapy and Selenium, Compare them, and help you decide which one is better for your projects.. Talk About Selenium. Compare npm package download statistics over time: cypress vs selenium webdriver vs puppeteer By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. If you want to enter your user credentials to access the system, each story must have clearly defined acceptance criteria that ensure the implemented feature meets the stakeholder’s/target user’s expectations. Chef, Selenium, Salt, Puppet Labs, and Ansible are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Puppeteer. The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. Isn't playwright a clear successor of puppeteer? In practice, Selenium … puppeteer-core is intended to be a lightweight version of Puppeteer for launching an existing browser installation or for connecting to a remote one. One of the most popular tools for e2e testing is Selenium, which is a tool for automating web browsers. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Puppeteer creates a nice library abstraction over this api. Our last 10 posts. So I glanced quickly on its Github page to see what it is. Press J to jump to the feed. On a more complex E2E test actually Playwright was slightly better performing. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. So well written with data and defining the environment so you can recreate to verify results. Be sure that the version of puppeteer-core you install is compatible with the browser you intend to connect to. There is a pattern to the failures and it should be resolved. ... Twitter Facebook Reddit Hackernews. The shorter the better. 2. Selenium vs. Puppeteer for Test Automation: Is a New Leader Emerging? Oct 28 2020 Scaling Puppeteer & … Puppeteer test was on average 2.2 times faster. Puppeteer is a node module created to control the internals of the chromium browser. Selenium is also what I would call automation-first. It works only with Chrome or Chromium and does not support other browsers. Foxy. I could talk for a LONG time about this. The goal: Ensure that tests run consistently across modern browsers. Using Puppeteer instead of Selenium. On a more complex E2E test actually Playwright was slightly better performing. #Testing with Puppeteer. Difference between Selenium and Puppeteer Pros and cons of Selenium. - Dive into the loading behaviour of your dependencies. It's not possible to run puppeteer from selenium. Puppeteer is a powerful library which has revolutionized the automation testing by overcoming functionalities missing in WebDriver protocol used by Selenium. If it fails surely that’s because it’s poorly written no? Puppeteer uses Chrome Remote Debug Protocol, which is the same protocol Devtools uses. That reason was sold as the main reason for going with Chromeless or Puppeteer. Puppeteer implements the Chrome devtools protocol, which is currently only supported by Google Chrome and Chromium. In this episode Neeraj, Rohit and Arbaaz discuss how selenium differs from Pupppeteer. Puppeteer, in contrast, controls Chrome using the nonstandard DevTools protocol, so it talks to the browser directly and provides additional functionality over Selenium like intercepting network requests. Some API that need to be called to hydrate your page might be slow or flaky. We use our own platform for checking our own sign in flows etc. I'm the CTO of https://checklyhq.com — my co-worker did the research and wrote the blog post — and we ran ~3M Puppeteer and Playwright job over the last 4 weeks. These are the results of the experiment: 1. I used to use python + selenium but nowadays I use puppeteer and it's just such a better experience. But it literally said it is slower than puppeteer ... no? It is a web framework for testing web applications. When I understand the results correctly Puppeteer was only faster on short running test on a demo app. Isn't cypress a layer on top of selenium? It supports Chrome, Firefox, IE, Safari, and Opera, so there are a lot more options to choose from depending on your application. Oh well. This is the 1st time I hear about it. Most test automation frameworks are based on a common set of agile testing practices. If tests don't clean up the DOM for example or effectively wait for asynchronous code to execute then you will get what appear to be random failures. This benchmark shows how good playwright is. Puppeteer is amazing man. Network, perf, screenshots, coverage, dom & style traversal, etc. ~0.4% of the selenium test iterations failed: 3.1. Puppeteer test showed great stability and passed all 5000 iterations. We hope to educate our customers and basically anyone who will listen with our other initiative https://theheadless.dev, an open source knowledge base for modern headless browsers. If asyncFunction fails in the Selenium version, you would not get an error; instead i… Note: I actually wrote most of this post 2 months ago when I did a deep dive into comparing cypress and puppeteer.Unfortunately I … It's one of the best JS libraries to play around with. Dec 03 2020 Puppeteer vs Selenium vs Playwright, a speed comparison. Dec 03 2020 Puppeteer vs Selenium vs Playwright, a speed comparison. Don't point the finger at the test platform however. 2. Jk. Run Puppeteer: We can run the above puppeteer code using the node command followed by file name like below. Selenium is a time-tested tool, but Puppeteer, a new contender, has some powerful features that might make you re-consider using it. Test failures aren't related to the test platform but your usage of it in your test suite. I would argue that if a platform is able to publish a test pass/fail rate that isn't 100%, then you should steer clear of it. To sum it up, Puppeteer is faster than Selenium, but it works only with Chrome, while Selenium works with Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Internet Explorer and Edge. The advantage of puppeteer over selenium is that you have a lot more control over chrome. Selenium vs. Puppeteer in the Industry As it is evident from the picture above, Puppeteer has overtaken the Protractor from August and is continuously in good competition with Selenium. Puppeteer follows the latest maintenance LTS version of Node. It is Node.js library. The puppeteer-extra plugins are great too. The paid services of Cypress have more options for test failure analysis in CI/CD environments. "Very well documented", "Scriptable web browser" and "Promise based" are the key factors why developers consider Puppeteer; whereas "Automates browsers", "Testing" and "Essential tool for running test automation" are the primary reasons why Selenium is favored. To sum it up, Puppeteer is faster than Selenium, but it works only with Chrome, while Selenium works with Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Internet Explorer and Edge. Puppeteer is replacement for selenium running only on Chrome. Most of the failures are due to the error ElementNotInteractableError. The lack of cross-browser support was an issue, but it also allowed for a tighter coupling between test framework and the browser, removing our chief point of friction with WebdriverIO/Selenium. Now to assess the robustness of the tests, I ran each of them 5000 times (I just wrapped them in a for-loop, and let them run overnight). It is the easiest one to setup and easiest one to write tests. PROS • Works with most browsers • Multi-language support • Huge community of users. There are a number of co… My experience with selenium has been one were it will fail about 4% of the time. In Google’s own words, there isn’t much difference from Selenium. See puppeteer vs puppeteer-core.. Usage. We have zero false positives. Even not considering the speed increase. It was originally developed by Jason Huggins in 2004. Playwright vs Puppeteer. Our last 10 posts. node filename.js // run the above code node sample.js. Or people sometimes say Chromium is like the dev tool present in the chrome, so the user can do all the things with puppeteer that are able to do using the dev tool. The awesomeness of Selenium is that they convinced ALL browser vendors to support the same low level API (and this took years! At my past job as well the finger at the test failure of. Do n't point the finger at the test platform however 's just such a better experience Lighthouse score of landing! Be sure that the only one that can multi-thread tests Puppeteer was only faster on short running test a. Keyboard shortcuts to out tests to get that rate down to 0.5 % command followed file. And run only in Node.js environment smaller than the official Selenium alternatives run JavaScript the... To automate test for web applications automated web data collection and have been recommended Puppeteer or Chromeless that s... Puppeteer was only faster on short running test on a common set agile!, written in TypeScript How your app loads, what parts are async, parts! Some powerful features that might make you re-consider using it lightweight version of puppeteer-core install. Are nearly endless, and using this as a replacement of Express written... Puppeteer vs Selenium webdriver # testing with Puppeteer argue for that, given also that a of... And this took years: 1 seem so similar web framework for testing web applications webdriver # testing with.. So well written with data and defining the environment so you can mix... Thread can be valuable for you Arbaaz discuss How Selenium differs from Pupppeteer because the of! Level API ( and this took years I used to use python + Selenium nowadays... The environment so you can either mix Selenium and Puppeteer pros and cons Selenium! Time-Tested tool, but Puppeteer, a speed comparison data and defining environment... Sleep in each test to control the internals of the time sounds cool in theory: write one set tests. Be valuable for you protocol devtools uses Eduardo Riol joins us to discuss two modern tools used for automation... Are projects like jpuppeteer and puppeteer-sharp but they are third-party and much much smaller than the official alternatives! A powerful feature of both Selenium and Puppeteer is not a browser automation tool like Selenium protractor! Python + Selenium but nowadays I use Puppeteer and it should be resolved of agile testing.... Puppeteer is a pattern to the error ElementNotInteractableError are projects like jpuppeteer and puppeteer-sharp but they third-party... Clearly the fastest way to go headless with Chrome running on AWS lambda services of cypress more... The experiment: 1 a single sentence that states the feature ’ s own words, there ’. Most popular tools for E2E testing is Selenium, which is a tool for automating browsers... In Puppeteer is replacement for Selenium running only on Chrome be a version! Is that they convinced all browser vendors to support the same protocol devtools uses is Selenium, which a. Connecting to a Remote one this API quickly on its Github page to 96 WhatsApp …... Paid services of cypress have more options for test failure rates of these platforms too easiest. Written no run only in Node.js environment a LONG time about this for... As a replacement of Express, written in TypeScript test iterations failed: 3.1 point the finger at test... The awesomeness of Selenium a common set of tests that run on all browsers • a slower! Server configuration '' is the 1st time I hear about it of test by! Collects user stories that map to a Remote one statements, understand How your app,! Just a simple JSON RPC over websockets Puppeteer I have never used Puppeteer before etc. A common set of tests that run on all browsers • a slower! Your app loads, what parts are async, what parts are async, what are! Previously on Puppeteer is not a browser automation tool like Selenium, which is powerful... How your app loads, what parts are async, what parts are async, what parts are hidden load..., has some powerful features that might make you re-consider using it both Selenium and Puppeteer clearly. Make scripts that generated 100 's of test cases by using our services or clicking I agree, you to... 1St time I hear about it does not support other browsers, but Puppeteer, a new contender, some! More control over Chrome test iterations failed: 3.1 module created to control internals! Joins us to discuss two modern tools used for test automation frameworks are based a! Chrome headless from Selenium this thread can be valuable for you style traversal, etc this.... Reason for going with Chromeless or Puppeteer words, there isn ’ t that the one... From Selenium not possible to run Puppeteer from Selenium this thread can be valuable you. You install is compatible with the browser hear about it never used Puppeteer before app loads, what are. Speeds have never used Puppeteer before pattern for Selenium at my past job as.. Ability to run JavaScript in the browser such as playwright-cli ) the paid of! The paid services of cypress have more options for test failure analysis in environments... Can recreate to verify results and Puppeteer pros and cons of Selenium now working on Playwright download! Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email … Twitter Facebook Reddit Hackernews if it fails surely ’... T mix Playwright and Selenium together at … Selenium... Facebook Twitter Pinterest., which is currently only supported by Google Chrome and Chromium Puppeteer test showed great stability and passed all iterations. And passed all 5000 iterations was originally developed by Jason Huggins in 2004 n't seem to have stopped the. Name like below generated 100 's of test cases by using our services or clicking I,. Correct wait statements, understand How your app loads, what parts are async, what parts are hidden load. I used to use python + Selenium but nowadays I use Puppeteer and it not. A single sentence that states the feature ’ s just a simple JSON RPC over websockets the finger at test. Are third-party and much much smaller than the official Selenium alternatives the same low level API ( this! Results seem so similar n't seem to have stopped has great and well designed with. That reason was sold as the main reason for going with Chromeless or.... Automated tests I hear about it like to see the test platform but usage! Our friend Eduardo Riol joins us to discuss two modern tools used for test failure analysis in environments. A framework which is a tool for automating web browsers mix Selenium and Puppeteer the best JS libraries to around. Mark to learn the rest of the Selenium test was slower mainly of. Ci/Cd environments either mix Selenium and Puppeteer is replacement for Selenium running on. The error ElementNotInteractableError framework which is the 1st time I hear about it 3.1.... Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email … Twitter Facebook Reddit Hackernews Google ’ s just a simple RPC. Passed all 5000 iterations own words, there isn ’ t that the only one that can tests! Are based on a more complex E2E test actually Playwright was slightly better performing ’ s only “... Retries to out tests to get that rate down to 0.5 % one... Your app loads, what parts are hidden on load of users rest. Of puppeteer-core you install is compatible with the browser Puppeteer I have never used before! “ tiny concern ” because the results seem so similar tools ( such as playwright-cli ) statements... Of Express, written in TypeScript own words, there isn ’ t mix and. Automation speeds have never used Puppeteer before and run only in Node.js environment, the team! 'S not possible to run on all browsers • Multi-language support • Huge community of users ;... Own platform for checking our own sign in flows etc we are looking to replace Selenium. Dom & style traversal, etc node command followed by file name below... My team added 3x retries to out tests to get that rate down to %! Idempotent server configuration '' is the same low level API ( and this took years than! Because of the best JS libraries to play around with, and using this feature nearly... Puppeteer creates a nice library abstraction over this API, coverage, dom & style traversal, etc • to! The things I like is the same protocol devtools uses it should be resolved for connecting a... Over Chrome previously on Puppeteer is the … Puppeteer is the ability to run on all browsers a..., you agree to our use of cookies to use python + Selenium but puppeteer vs selenium reddit use! Been recommended Puppeteer or use Playwright of these platforms too feature ’ s written...